sheetsj’s avatarsheetsj’s Twitter Archive—№ 4,508

    1. …in reply to @snekse
      @snekse Hmmm that seems kinda nice. I personally don’t mind all the various little commits that make up a feature, but this isn’t bad for squashing. Still am nervous deleting a local branch when hit doesn’t realize it’s been squash merged to main
      Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo sheetsj’s avatar Mood -1 🙁
  1. …in reply to @sheetsj
    In some ways it’s like immutability vs mutable variables… immutable git would mean not rewriting history, I think. That mutation does allow for some nice things, but dealing with the side cases is just extra mental fatigue for me I guess
    On twitter.com Twitter logo sheetsj’s avatar Mood +4 🙂