sheetsj’s avatarsheetsj’s Twitter Archive—№ 4,507

  1. …in reply to @snekse
    @snekse Hmmm that seems kinda nice. I personally don’t mind all the various little commits that make up a feature, but this isn’t bad for squashing. Still am nervous deleting a local branch when hit doesn’t realize it’s been squash merged to main
    On twitter.com Twitter logo sheetsj’s avatar Mood -1 🙁
    1. …in reply to @sheetsj
      In some ways it’s like immutability vs mutable variables… immutable git would mean not rewriting history, I think. That mutation does allow for some nice things, but dealing with the side cases is just extra mental fatigue for me I guess
      Permalink On twitter.com Twitter logo sheetsj’s avatar Mood +4 🙂